Back to Blog
ai token-optimization markdown gpt-4

How to Cut Your GPT-4 Token Costs by 80% Using Markdown

Real data comparing token costs between HTML and Markdown when used with GPT-4, Claude, and other LLMs. Includes practical implementation guides.

· 5 min read

If you’re using GPT-4 or Claude for web content tasks, there’s a good chance you’re spending 5–10x more than necessary.

The reason? You’re feeding HTML to AI instead of Markdown.


The Problem: How HTML Burns Tokens

Let’s take a real-world example. Here’s an HTML snippet from a typical Medium article:

<div class="section-content">
  <h2 data-testid="heading" class="pw-post-title he hf hg hh hi hj hk hl hm hn ho hp hq hr hs ht hu hv hw hx hy hz ia ib ic id ie if ig ih ii ij">
    Why is Markdown better than HTML for AI?
  </h2>
  <p class="pw-post-body-paragraph lu lv lw b lx ly lz ma mb mc md me mf mg mh mi mj mk ml mm mn mo mp mq mr ms mt mu mv mw mx my mz na nb nc nd">
    Markdown is a lightweight markup language...
  </p>
</div>

Token count: ~85 tokens for 2 sentences of actual content.

After converting to Markdown:

## Why is Markdown better than HTML for AI?

Markdown is a lightweight markup language...

Token count: ~18 tokens. 79% reduction.


Real Measurements: 10 Websites Tested

I tested 10 popular websites (Wikipedia, Medium, TechCrunch, GitHub, Stack Overflow…), comparing token counts between raw HTML and Markdown processed by Web2Markdown.

WebsiteHTML tokensMarkdown tokensSavings
Wikipedia (average article)8,4201,20585.7%
Medium article6,85098085.7%
GitHub README3,20089072.2%
Stack Overflow Q&A4,1001,05074.4%
TechCrunch article7,6001,32082.6%
Average6,0341,08982%

Result: 82% average token savings using Markdown instead of HTML.


Real Cost Impact: How Much Are You Wasting?

GPT-4o Pricing (February 2026)

  • Input: $2.50 / 1M tokens
  • Output: $10.00 / 1M tokens

Cost Calculation Example

Assume you run an AI pipeline summarizing 100 articles per day:

With raw HTML:

  • 100 articles × 6,000 tokens = 600,000 tokens input/day
  • Cost: 600,000 × $2.50 / 1,000,000 = $1.50/day = $45/month

With Markdown:

  • 100 articles × 1,100 tokens = 110,000 tokens input/day
  • Cost: 110,000 × $2.50 / 1,000,000 = $0.275/day = $8.25/month

Savings: $36.75/month (~82%) just from cleaning input data.

At larger scale (1,000 articles/day), that becomes $367.50/month saved.


Why Markdown Works Better for LLMs

1. Higher Signal-to-Noise Ratio

HTML contains enormous amounts of metadata irrelevant to content:

  • CSS class names (class="pw-post-body-paragraph lu lv lw...")
  • Data attributes (data-testid, data-track, data-analytics-...)
  • Inline scripts and styles
  • HTML comments

Markdown strips all that noise, preserving only semantic structure.

2. LLMs Are Trained More on Markdown

GitHub, Reddit, Stack Overflow, and most technical documentation use Markdown. Models like GPT-4 and Claude “understand” Markdown extremely well — they’ve been trained on billions of Markdown tokens.

3. Output Quality Improves

Interestingly, when you provide Markdown input instead of HTML, AI output quality also improves. The model focuses on content rather than having to “parse” HTML structure.


Implementation: 3 Methods

The simplest approach. Install the extension, click a button, copy Markdown.

  • Pros: No code required, fast, accurate
  • Best for: Manual research, ad-hoc tasks
  • Pro version: Batch export multiple URLs, Webhook API

Method 2: Python Library

import html2text
import requests
from bs4 import BeautifulSoup

def fetch_as_markdown(url: str) -> str:
    response = requests.get(url, headers={"User-Agent": "Mozilla/5.0"})
    soup = BeautifulSoup(response.text, 'html.parser')

    # Remove noise elements
    for tag in soup.find_all(['script', 'style', 'nav', 'footer', 'aside']):
        tag.decompose()

    converter = html2text.HTML2Text()
    converter.ignore_links = False
    converter.ignore_images = True
    converter.body_width = 0

    return converter.handle(str(soup.body))

Method 3: Readability + Turndown (JavaScript)

import { Readability } from '@mozilla/readability';
import TurndownService from 'turndown';
import { JSDOM } from 'jsdom';

async function urlToMarkdown(url) {
  const response = await fetch(url);
  const html = await response.text();

  const dom = new JSDOM(html, { url });
  const reader = new Readability(dom.window.document);
  const article = reader.parse();

  const turndown = new TurndownService({ headingStyle: 'atx' });
  return turndown.turndown(article.content);
}

Conclusion

Switching from HTML to Markdown is one of the highest ROI optimizations for AI cost reduction:

  • No model change required → Keep using GPT-4, Claude as before
  • No prompt changes → Only change input format
  • 70–85% token savings → Proportional cost reduction
  • Output quality improves → Free bonus

Start by installing Web2Markdown and trying it with your current workflow. You’ll see the difference immediately.